David Schindler, Tilburg University

Registration is closed
Date and Time:
Tue, 5 February 2019 | 17:00 —
Tue, 5 February 2019 | 19:00
Place:
HSE,
room 4409
Address:
Moscow,
26-4 Shabolovka
RESEARCH SEMINARS

NES CSDSI & HSE ICSID Research Seminar on diversity and development joint with HSE Seminar on Political Economy


NES Center for the Study of Diversity and Social Interactions and HSE International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development are happy to invite you to our joint meeting of the Research Seminar on Diversity and Development and HSE Seminar on Political Economy.

Koen Schoors (Ghent University, NRU HSE) presents his paper "Generalized Trust, Preferences for Redistribution and Institutions" (joint with Ekaterina Borisova, Denis Ivanov)

Abstract:

We study how institutional quality moderates the relationship between generalized trust and preferences for redistribution. It has been well established in the literature that generalized trust is conducive to greater support for redistribution because it reduces expectations of cheating and free-riding among others. Following Algan et al. (2016), we hypothesize that the effect of trust on preferences for redistribution is conditional on the quality of the institutional environment. Trusting individuals, that is, are hypothesized to be more supportive of redistribution in favor of target groups with a high propensity of free-riding (like the poor and the unemployed) if the institutional environment is more likely to detect and penalize free-riders. We test this hypothesis with data from the Life in Transition II survey that contains 38,000 thousand respondents from 35 transition and developed countries. We find that the effect of individual trust on supporting redistribution in favor of the poor and the unemployed depends indeed on the quality of the formal institutions in the environment, like the country-level control of corruption, the rule of law and government effectiveness. Trust and formal institutions are therefore complements with respect to their effect on preferences for redistribution. This relationship is not observed for groups conventionally thought of as unambiguously deserving or delineated with free-riding proof eligibility criteria, i.e. for the old, the disabled, and families with children. Additionally, we find that trust under good institutions is associated indicating all beneficiary groups as deserving support.

Registration till noon of February 5.

Registration

Т.: +7 (495) 956-95-08 (Ext. 163)
E-mail: [email protected]

Newsletter subscription