Совместный семинар ЛИСОМО РЭШ и МЦИИР ВШЭ, объединённый с Семинаром НИУ ВШЭ по политической экономике

Registration is closed
Date and Time:
Tue, 5 February 2019 | 17:00 —
Tue, 5 February 2019 | 19:00
Place:
ВШЭ,
к. 4409
Address:
Москва,
Шаболовка 26-4
RESEARCH SEMINARS

Совместный семинар ЛИСОМО РЭШ и МЦИИР ВШЭ, объединенный с Семинаром НИУ ВШЭ по политической экономике

Кун Скоорс (Гентский университет, НИУ ВШЭ) выступит с докладом “Generalized Trust, Preferences for Redistribution and Institutions" (совместная работа с Екатериной Борисовой и Денисом Ивановым).


Приглашаем вас на Совместный семинар ЛИСОМО РЭШ и МЦИИР ВШЭ, объединённый с Семинаром НИУ ВШЭ по политической экономике. 

Спикер семинара Кун Скоорс (Гентский университет, НИУ ВШЭ) выступит с докладом “Generalized Trust, Preferences for Redistribution and Institutions" (совместная работа с Екатериной Борисовой и Денисом Ивановым).

Аннотация: 

We study how institutional quality moderates the relationship between generalized trust and preferences for redistribution. It has been well established in the literature that generalized trust is conducive to greater support for redistribution because it reduces expectations of cheating and free-riding among others. Following Algan et al. (2016), we hypothesize that the effect of trust on preferences for redistribution is conditional on the quality of the institutional environment. Trusting individuals, that is, are hypothesized to be more supportive of redistribution in favor of target groups with a high propensity of free-riding (like the poor and the unemployed) if the institutional environment is more likely to detect and penalize free-riders. We test this hypothesis with data from the Life in Transition II survey that contains 38,000 thousand respondents from 35 transition and developed countries. We find that the effect of individual trust on supporting redistribution in favor of the poor and the unemployed depends indeed on the quality of the formal institutions in the environment, like the country-level control of corruption, the rule of law and government effectiveness. Trust and formal institutions are therefore complements with respect to their effect on preferences for redistribution. This relationship is not observed for groups conventionally thought of as unambiguously deserving or delineated with free-riding proof eligibility criteria, i.e. for the old, the disabled, and families with children. Additionally, we find that trust under good institutions is associated indicating all beneficiary groups as deserving support.

Регистрация: до 12:00 5 февраля

Registration

Т.: +7 (495) 956-95-08 (Ext. 163)
E-mail: [email protected]

Newsletter subscription